TagDetect¶

Introduction¶

The TagDetect modules are optional on-board modules of the rc_visard NG and require separate licenses to be purchased. The licenses are included in every rc_visard NG purchased after 01.07.2020.

The TagDetect modules run on board the rc_visard NG and allow the detection of 2D bar codes and tags. Currently, there are TagDetect modules for QR codes and AprilTags. The modules, furthermore, compute the position and orientation of each tag in the 3D camera coordinate system, making it simple to manipulate a tag with a robot or to localize the camera with respect to a tag.

Tag detection is made up of three steps:

Tag reading on the 2D image pair (see Tag reading).
Estimation of the pose of each tag (see Pose estimation).
Re-identification of previously seen tags (see Tag re-identification).

In the following, the two supported tag types are described, followed by a comparison.

QR code¶

Fig. 21 Sample QR code

QR codes are two-dimensional bar codes that contain arbitrary user-defined data. There is wide support for decoding of QR codes on commodity hardware such as smartphones. Also, many online and offline tools are available for the generation of such codes.

The “pixels” of a QR code are called modules. Appearance and resolution of QR codes change with the amount of data they contain. While the special patterns in the three corners are always 7 modules wide, the number of modules between them increases the more data is stored. The lowest-resolution QR code is of size 21x21 modules and can contain up to 152 bits.

Even though many QR code generation tools support generation of specially designed QR codes (e.g., containing a logo, having round corners, or having dots as modules), a reliable detection of these tags by the rc_visard NG’s TagDetect module is not guaranteed. The same holds for QR codes which contain characters that are not part of regular ASCII.

AprilTag¶

Fig. 22 A 16h5 tag (left), a 36h11 tag (center) and a 41h12 tag (right). AprilTags consist of a mandatory white (a) and black (b) border and a variable amount of data bits (c).

AprilTags are similar to QR codes. However, they are specifically designed for robust identification at large distances. As for QR codes, we will call the tag pixels modules. Fig. 22 shows how AprilTags are structured. They have a mandatory white and black border, each one module wide. The tag families 16h5, 25h9, 36h10 and 36h11 are surrounded by this border and carry a variable amount of data modules in the center. For tag family 41h12, the black and white border is shifted towards the inside and the data modules are in the center and also at the border of the tags. Other than QR codes, AprilTags do not contain any user-defined information but are identified by a predefined family and ID. The tags in Fig. 22 for example are of family 16h5, 36h11 and 41h12 have id 0, 11 and 0, respectively. All supported families are shown in Table 15.

Table 15 AprilTag families¶
Family	Number of tag IDs	Recommended
16h5	30	-
25h9	35	o
36h10	2320	o
36h11	587	+
41h12	2115	+

For each family, the number before the “h” states the number of data modules contained in the tag: While a 16h5 tag contains 16 (4x4) data modules ((c) in Fig. 22), a 36h11 tag contains 36 (6x6) modules and a 41h12 tag contains 41 (3x3 inner + 4x8 outer) modules. The number behind the “h” refers to the Hamming distance between two tags of the same family. The higher, the more robust is the detection, but the fewer individual tag IDs are available for the same number of data modules (see Table 15).

The advantage of fewer modules (as for 16h5 compared to 36h11) is the lower resolution of the tag. Hence, each tag module is larger and the tag therefore can be detected from a larger distance. This, however, comes at a price: Firstly, fewer data modules lead to fewer individual tag IDs. Secondly, and more importantly, detection robustness is significantly reduced due to a higher false positive rate; i.e, tags are mixed up or nonexistent tags are detected in random image texture or noise. The 41h12 family has its border shifted towards the inside, which gives it more data modules at a lower number of total modules compared to the 36h11 family.

For these reasons we recommend using the 41h12 and 36h11 families and highly discourage the use of the 16h5 family. The latter family should only be used if a large detection distance really is necessary for an application. However, the maximum detection distance increases only by approximately 25% when using a 16h5 tag instead of a 36h11 tag.

Pre-generated AprilTags can be downloaded at the AprilTag project website (https://april.eecs.umich.edu/software/apriltag.html). There, each family consists of multiple PNGs containing single tags. Each pixel in the PNGs corresponds to one AprilTag module. When printing the tags of the families 36h11, 36h10, 25h9 and 16h5 special care must be taken to also include the white border around the tag that is contained in the PNG (see (a) in Fig. 22). Moreover, all tags should be scaled to the desired printing size without any interpolation, so that the sharp edges are preserved.

Comparison¶

Both QR codes and AprilTags have their up and down sides. While QR codes allow arbitrary user-defined data to be stored, AprilTags have a pre-defined and limited set of tags. On the other hand, AprilTags have a lower resolution and can therefore be detected at larger distances. Moreover, the continuous white to black border in AprilTags allow for more precise pose estimation.

Note

If user-defined data is not required, AprilTags should be preferred over QR codes.

Tag reading¶

The first step in the tag detection pipeline is reading the tags on the 2D image pair. This step takes most of the processing time and its precision is crucial for the precision of the resulting tag pose. To control the speed of this step, the quality parameter can be set by the user. It results in a downscaling of the image pair before reading the tags. High yields the largest maximum detection distance and highest precision, but also the highest processing time. Low results in the smallest maximum detection distance and lowest precision, but processing requires less than half of the time. Medium lies in between. Please note that this quality parameter has no relation to the quality parameter of Stereo matching.

Fig. 23 Visualization of module size \(s\), size of a tag in modules \(r\), and size of a tag in meters \(t\) for AprilTags (left and center) and QR codes (right)

The maximum detection distance \(z\) at quality High can be approximated by using the following formulae,

\[z = \frac{f s}{p},\]

\[s = \frac{t}{r},\]

where \(f\) is the focal length in pixels and \(s\) is the size of a module in meters. \(s\) can easily be calculated by the latter formula, where \(t\) is the size of the tag in meters and \(r\) is the width of the code in modules (for AprilTags without the white border). Fig. 23 visualizes these variables. \(p\) denotes the number of image pixels per module required for detection. It is different for QR codes and AprilTags. Moreover, it varies with the tag’s angle to the camera and illumination. Approximate values for robust detection are:

AprilTag: \(p=5\) pixels/module
QR code: \(p=6\) pixels/module

The following tables give sample maximum distances for different situations, assuming a focal length of 1075 pixels and the parameter quality to be set to High.

Table 16 Maximum detection distance examples for AprilTags with a width of \(t=4\) cm¶
AprilTag family	Tag width	Maximum distance
36h11 (recommended)	8 modules	1.1 m
16h5	6 modules	1.4 m
41h12 (recommended)	5 modules	1.7 m

Table 17 Maximum detection distance examples for QR codes with a width of \(t=8\) cm¶
Tag width	Maximum distance
29 modules	0.49 m
21 modules	0.70 m

Pose estimation¶

For each detected tag, the pose of this tag in the camera coordinate frame is estimated. A requirement for pose estimation is that a tag is fully visible in the left and right camera image. The coordinate frame of the tag is aligned as shown below.

Fig. 24 Coordinate frames of AprilTags (left and center) and QR codes (right)

The z-axis is pointing “into” the tag. Please note that for AprilTags, although having the white border included in their definition, the coordinate system’s origin is placed exactly at the transition from the white to the black border. Since AprilTags do not have an obvious orientation, the origin is defined as the upper left corner in the orientation they are pre-generated in.

During pose estimation, the tag’s size is also estimated, while assuming the tag to be square. For QR codes, the size covers the full tag. For AprilTags, the size covers only the part inside the border defined by the transition from the black to the white border modules, hence ignoring the outermost white border for the tag families 16h5, 25h9, 36h10 and 36h11.

The user can also specify the approximate size (\(\pm 10\%\)) of tags with a specific ID. All tags not matching this size constraint are automatically filtered out. This information is further used to resolve ambiguities in pose estimation that may arise if multiple tags with the same ID are visible in the left and right image and these tags are aligned in parallel to the image rows.

Note

For best pose estimation results one should make sure to accurately print the tag and to attach it to a rigid and as planar as possible surface. Any distortion of the tag or bump in the surface will degrade the estimated pose.

Note

It is highly recommended to set the approximate size of a tag. Otherwise, if multiple tags with the same ID are visible in the left or right image, pose estimation may compute a wrong pose if these tags have the same orientation and are approximately aligned in parallel to the image rows. However, even if the approximate size is not given, the TagDetect modules try to detect such situations and filter out affected tags.

Tag re-identification¶

Each tag has an ID; for AprilTags it is the family plus tag ID, for QR codes it is the contained data. However, these IDs are not unique, since the same tag may appear multiple times in a scene.

For distinction of these tags, the TagDetect modules also assign each detected tag a unique identifier. To help the user identifying an identical tag over multiple detections, tag detection tries to re-identify tags; if successful, a tag is assigned the same unique identifier again.

Tag re-identification compares the positions of the corners of the tags in the camera coordinate frame to find identical tags. Tags are assumed identical if they did not or only slightly move in that frame.

By setting the max_corner_distance threshold, the user can specify how much a tag is allowed move in the static coordinate frame between two detections to be considered identical. This parameter defines the maximum distance between the corners of two tags, which is shown in Fig. 25. The Euclidean distances of all four corresponding tag corners are computed in 3D. If none of these distances exceeds the threshold, the tags are considered identical.

Fig. 25 Simplified visualization of tag re-identification. Euclidean distances between associated tag corners in 3D are compared (red arrows).

After a number of tag detection runs, previously detected tag instances will be discarded if they are not detected in the meantime. This can be configured by the parameter forget_after_n_detections.

Hand-eye calibration¶

In case the camera has been calibrated to a robot, the TagDetect module can automatically provide poses in the robot coordinate frame. For the TagDetect node’s Services, the frame of the output poses can be controlled with the pose_frame argument.

Two different pose_frame values can be chosen:

Camera frame (camera). All poses provided by the module are in the camera frame.
External frame (external). All poses provided by the module are in the external frame, configured by the user during the hand-eye calibration process. The module relies on the on-board Hand-eye calibration module to retrieve the sensor mounting (static or robot mounted) and the hand-eye transformation. If the sensor mounting is static, no further information is needed. If the sensor is robot-mounted, the robot_pose is required to transform poses to and from the external frame.

All pose_frame values that are not camera or external are rejected.

Parameters¶

There are two separate modules available for tag detection, one for detecting AprilTags and one for QR codes, named rc_april_tag_detect and rc_qr_code_detect, respectively. Apart from the module names they share the same interface definition.

In addition to the REST-API interface, the TagDetect modules provide pages on the Web GUI under Modules ‣ AprilTag and Modules ‣ QR Code, on which they can be tried out and configured manually.

In the following, the parameters are listed based on the example of rc_qr_code_detect. They are the same for rc_april_tag_detect.

This module offers the following run-time parameters:

Table 18 The `rc_qr_code_detect` module’s run-time parameters¶
Name	Type	Min	Max	Default	Description
`detect_inverted_tags`	bool	false	true	false	Detect tags with black and white exchanged
`forget_after_n_detections`	int32	1	1000	30	Number of detection runs after which to forget about a previous tag during tag re-identification
`max_corner_distance`	float64	0.001	0.01	0.005	Maximum distance of corresponding tag corners in meters during tag re-identification
`quality`	string	-	-	High	Quality of tag detection: [Low, Medium, High]
`use_cached_images`	bool	false	true	false	Use most recently received image pair instead of waiting for a new pair

Via the REST-API, these parameters can be set as follows.

PUT http://<host>/api/v2/pipelines/0/nodes/<rc_qr_code_detect|rc_april_tag_detect>/parameters/parameters?<parameter-name>=<value>

PUT http://<host>/api/v1/nodes/<rc_qr_code_detect|rc_april_tag_detect>/parameters?<parameter-name>=<value>

Status values¶

The TagDetect modules reports the following status values:

Table 19 The `rc_qr_code_detect` and `rc_april_tag_detect` module’s status values¶
Name	Description
`data_acquisition_time`	Time in seconds required to acquire image pair
`last_timestamp_processed`	The timestamp of the last processed image pair
`processing_time`	Processing time of the last detection in seconds
`state`	The current state of the node

The reported state can take one of the following values.

Table 20 Possible states of the TagDetect modules¶
State name	Description
IDLE	The module is idle.
RUNNING	The module is running and ready for tag detection.
FATAL	A fatal error has occurred.

Services¶

The TagDetect modules implement a state machine for starting and stopping. The actual tag detection can be triggered via detect.

The user can explore and call the rc_qr_code_detect and rc_april_tag_detect modules’ services, e.g. for development and testing, using the REST-API interface or the rc_visard NG Web GUI.

`detect`¶

Triggers a tag detection.
Details
Depending on the use_cached_images parameter, the module will use the latest received image pair (if set to true) or wait for a new pair that is captured after the service call was triggered (if set to false, this is the default). Even if set to true, tag detection will never use one image pair twice.

It is recommended to call detect in state RUNNING only. It is also possible to be called in state IDLE, resulting in an auto-start and stop of the module. This, however, has some drawbacks: First, the call will take considerably longer; second, tag re-identification will not work. It is therefore highly recommended to manually start the module before calling detect.

Tags might be omitted from the detect response due to several reasons, e.g., if a tag is visible in only one of the cameras or if pose estimation did not succeed. These filtered-out tags are noted in the log, which can be accessed as described in Downloading log files.

A visualization of the latest detection is shown on the Web GUI tabs of the TagDetect modules. Please note that this visualization will only be shown after calling the detection service at least once. On the Web GUI, one can also manually try the detection by clicking the Detect button.

Due to changes in system time on the rc_visard NG there might occur jumps of timestamps, forward as well as backward (see Time synchronization). Forward jumps do not have an effect on the TagDetect module. Backward jumps, however, invalidate already received images. Therefore, in case a backwards time jump is detected, an error of value -102 will be issued on the next detect call, also to inform the user that the timestamps included in the response will jump back. This service can be called as follows.
API version 2

API version 1 (deprecated)
PUT http://<host>/api/v2/pipelines/0/nodes/<rc_qr_code_detect|rc_april_tag_detect>/services/detect
PUT http://<host>/api/v1/nodes/<rc_qr_code_detect|rc_april_tag_detect>/services/detect
Request

Response
Optional arguments:
tags is the list of tag IDs that the TagDetect module should detect. For QR codes, the ID is the contained data. For AprilTags, it is “<family>_<id>”, so, e.g., for a tag of family 36h11 and ID 5, it is “36h11_5”. Naturally, the AprilTag module can only be triggered for AprilTags, and the QR code module only for QR codes.

The tags list can also be left empty. In that case, all detected tags will be returned. This feature should be used only during development and debugging of an application. Whenever possible, the concrete tag IDs should be listed, on the one hand avoiding some false positives, on the other hand speeding up tag detection by filtering tags not of interest.

For AprilTags, the user can not only specify concrete tags but also a complete family by setting the ID to “<family>”, so, e.g., “36h11”. All tags of this family will then be detected. It is further possible to specify multiple complete tag families or a combination of concrete tags and complete tag families; for instance, triggering for “36h11”, “25h9_3”, and “36h10” at the same time.

In addition to the ID, the approximate size (\(\pm 10\%\)) of a tag can be set with the size parameter. As described in Pose estimation, this information helps to resolve ambiguities in pose estimation that may arise in certain situations.

pose_frame controls whether the poses of the detected tags are returned in the camera or external frame, as detailed in Hand-eye calibration. The default is camera.

The definition for the request arguments with corresponding datatypes is:
{
  "args": {
    "pose_frame": "string",
    "robot_pose": {
      "orientation": {
        "w": "float64",
        "x": "float64",
        "y": "float64",
        "z": "float64"
      },
      "position": {
        "x": "float64",
        "y": "float64",
        "z": "float64"
      }
    },
    "tags": [
      {
        "id": "string",
        "size": "float64"
      }
    ]
  }
}
timestamp is set to the timestamp of the image pair the tag detection ran on.

tags contains all detected tags.

id is the ID of the tag, similar to id in the request.

instance_id is the random unique identifier of the tag assigned by tag re-identification.

pose contains position and orientation. The orientation is in quaternion format.

pose_frame is set to the coordinate frame above pose refers to. It will either be “camera” or “external”.

size will be set to the estimated tag size in meters; for AprilTags, the white border is not included.

return_code holds possible warnings or error codes.

The definition for the response with corresponding datatypes is:
{
  "name": "detect",
  "response": {
    "return_code": {
      "message": "string",
      "value": "int16"
    },
    "tags": [
      {
        "id": "string",
        "instance_id": "string",
        "pose": {
          "orientation": {
            "w": "float64",
            "x": "float64",
            "y": "float64",
            "z": "float64"
          },
          "position": {
            "x": "float64",
            "y": "float64",
            "z": "float64"
          }
        },
        "pose_frame": "string",
        "size": "float64",
        "timestamp": {
          "nsec": "int32",
          "sec": "int32"
        }
      }
    ],
    "timestamp": {
      "nsec": "int32",
      "sec": "int32"
    }
  }
}

`start`¶

Starts the module by transitioning from IDLE to RUNNING.

Details
When running, the module receives images from the stereo camera and is ready to perform tag detections. To save computing resources, the module should only be running when necessary.

This service can be called as follows.
API version 2

API version 1 (deprecated)
PUT http://<host>/api/v2/pipelines/0/nodes/<rc_qr_code_detect|rc_april_tag_detect>/services/start
PUT http://<host>/api/v1/nodes/<rc_qr_code_detect|rc_april_tag_detect>/services/start
Request

Response

This service has no arguments.
The definition for the response with corresponding datatypes is:
{
  "name": "start",
  "response": {
    "accepted": "bool",
    "current_state": "string"
  }
}

`stop`¶

Stops the module by transitioning to IDLE.
Details
This transition can be performed from state RUNNING and FATAL. All tag re-identification information is cleared during stopping.

This service can be called as follows.
API version 2

API version 1 (deprecated)
PUT http://<host>/api/v2/pipelines/0/nodes/<rc_qr_code_detect|rc_april_tag_detect>/services/stop
PUT http://<host>/api/v1/nodes/<rc_qr_code_detect|rc_april_tag_detect>/services/stop
Request

Response

This service has no arguments.
The definition for the response with corresponding datatypes is:
{
  "name": "stop",
  "response": {
    "accepted": "bool",
    "current_state": "string"
  }
}

`restart`¶

Restarts the module.
Details
If in RUNNING or FATAL, the module will be stopped and then started. If in IDLE, the module will be started.

This service can be called as follows.
API version 2

API version 1 (deprecated)
PUT http://<host>/api/v2/pipelines/0/nodes/<rc_qr_code_detect|rc_april_tag_detect>/services/restart
PUT http://<host>/api/v1/nodes/<rc_qr_code_detect|rc_april_tag_detect>/services/restart
Request

Response

This service has no arguments.
The definition for the response with corresponding datatypes is:
{
  "name": "restart",
  "response": {
    "accepted": "bool",
    "current_state": "string"
  }
}

`reset_defaults`¶

Resets all parameters of the module to its default values, as listed in above table.

Details
This service can be called as follows.
API version 2

API version 1 (deprecated)
PUT http://<host>/api/v2/pipelines/0/nodes/<rc_qr_code_detect|rc_april_tag_detect>/services/reset_defaults
PUT http://<host>/api/v1/nodes/<rc_qr_code_detect|rc_april_tag_detect>/services/reset_defaults
Request

Response

This service has no arguments.
The definition for the response with corresponding datatypes is:
{
  "name": "reset_defaults",
  "response": {
    "return_code": {
      "message": "string",
      "value": "int16"
    }
  }
}

Return codes¶

Each service response contains a return_code, which consists of a value plus an optional message. A successful service returns with a return_code value of 0. Negative return_code values indicate that the service failed. Positive return_code values indicate that the service succeeded with additional information. The smaller value is selected in case a service has multiple return_code values, but all messages are appended in the return_code message.

The following table contains a list of common return codes:

Code Description

0 Success

-1 An invalid argument was provided

-4 A timeout occurred while waiting for the image pair

-9 The license is not valid

-11 Sensor not connected, not supported or not ready

-101 Internal error during tag detection

-102 There was a backwards jump of system time

-103 Internal error during tag pose estimation

-200 A fatal internal error occurred

200 Multiple warnings occurred; see list in message

201 The module was not in state RUNNING

TagDetect¶

Introduction¶

QR code¶

AprilTag¶

Comparison¶

Tag reading¶

Pose estimation¶

Tag re-identification¶

Hand-eye calibration¶

Parameters¶

Status values¶

Services¶

detect¶

start¶

stop¶

restart¶

reset_defaults¶

Return codes¶

`detect`¶

`start`¶

`stop`¶

`restart`¶

`reset_defaults`¶